Approximately 1.2 million years ago, Homo erectus, an ancient human species, exhibited the initial indications of depilation. A team of researchers hailing from the University of Glasgow, eminent in the realm of anthropology, embarked on a quest to emulate the lifestyle of Homo erectus to delve into the potential catalysts behind this hair reduction. 

       One conceivable theory __11__ that parasites or viruses are the prime instigators. While dense fur provided insulation for eons, it also magnetized an array of parasites such as lice, flies, and ticks, which could harbor deleterious viruses. This conjecture postulates that the diminution in hair served as a defense mechanism against these parasites. However, this begs the question of why we still have hair on our heads as well as pubic hair. Mark Pagel, leading the evolutionary biology __12__ at the University of Reading, proposes that cranial hair serves as a shield against solar radiation, while pubic hair functions to ensnare scents for sexual allure and pheromone enhancement. 

     Considering its significance, innumerable attempts have been made to retain cranial hair. A cutting-edge research endeavor currently at the __13__ of combatting hair loss revolves around the exploration of exosome therapy. This groundbreaking methodology entails leveraging extracellular vesicles, specifically exosomes. Researchers are probing the potential of exosomes to incite hair follicle regeneration and stimulate follicular __14__. By harnessing the intrinsic regenerative capacities of exosomes, particularly those __15__, scientists aspire to revolutionize therapeutic modalities for hair restoration. This innovative paradigm holds significant promise in furnishing efficacious remedies for a spectrum of alopecia variants and androgenic alopecia, by orchestrating intricate cellular signaling cascades to invigorate quiescent follicles and precipitate robust hair repopulation.

       In a recent dialogue conducted by Associated Press (AP) correspondents with library officials, the West Haven Library in Connecticut expressed the substantial financial disparities between physical and digital editions. Presently, libraries are precluded from acquiring e-books at fixed rates, __17__ the communal lending framework, thereby subjecting them to inflated lease rates determined by publishers. For instance, the West Haven Library __18__ that while a physical copy of a book incurs an $18 expenditure, leasing its digital counterpart commands a steep $55. These leasing terms, unilaterally __19__ by publishers, often come with non-negotiable clauses and finite durations. 

      Attempts aimed at mitigating this issue through legislative measures have encountered resistance from the publishing industry. Nevertheless, librarians in several states, notably Connecticut and Massachusetts, have tabled proposals to ameliorate the financial burdens and restrictions associated with digital acquisitions. The discourse surrounding this issue shows the __20__ need to strike a delicate balance that upholds intellectual property rights while safeguarding the finance of libraries.

       Singapore’s language policy stands as a paragon of intricate multilingualism, epitomizing a nuanced approach that harmonizes global exigencies with cultural preservation imperatives. Central to this policy is the primacy of English, established during colonial rule and now __21__ as the nation’s lingua franca. This deliberate choice not only fortifies Singapore’s global competitiveness but also engenders seamless intercultural communication in an era of heightened global interconnectedness.            Beyond the lingua franca, Singapore’s language policy manifests a profound commitment to preserving cultural heritage through the veneration and promotion of mother tongue languages. Mandarin Chinese, Malay, and Tamil, __22__ official status, are not merely languages but vital conduits of cultural legacy. A salient manifestation of this commitment lies in the compulsory instruction of __23__ mother tongue languages in educational curricula. This dual focus on English and mother tongue languages ensures that Singaporeans maintain strong ties to their cultural roots while __24__ the complexities of an increasingly interconnected world.

       Moreover, Singapore’s linguistic inclusivity permeates the public domain, encapsulating a palpable celebration of its diverse linguistic __25__. Street signs, official documents, and public announcements are invariably presented in multiple languages, emblematic of Singapore’s __26__ commitment to inclusivity and respect for linguistic diversity.

        Nevertheless, notwithstanding its achievements, Singapore’s language policy encounters persistent challenges, chiefly stemming from the __27__ of English and the concomitant erosion mother tongue languages. The increasing dominance of English in various domains of public and private life poses a conundrum for the preservation of linguistic diversity and cultural heritage. In response to these challenges, the Singaporean government has embarked on targeted __28__ such as the Speak Mandarin Campaign and bilingual education programs, aimed at fortifying the vitality of mother tongue languages amidst the relentless onslaught of globalizing forces. 

       For many nations involved in similar context, Singapore’s language policy serves as a testament to the delicate equilibrium between global pragmatism and cultural preservation. By __29__ multilingualism, Singapore not only enhances its economic resilience and global competitiveness but also safeguards its rich cultural heritage. As the __30__ of successful multilingualism, Singapore illuminates a path forward for nations grappling with the complexities of linguistic diversity in an increasingly interconnected world. 

(AB) hegemony (AC) respective (AD) unwavering (AE) beacon (BC) unfeigned (BD) tapestry (BE) navigating (CD) onerous (CE) corrigible (DE) accorded (ABC) squandering (ABD) entrenched (ABE) initiatives (BCD) championing (BCE) recapitulated

       While the movement’s precise origins are difficult to pinpoint, discontent with influencer culture has been mounting online for years. __(32)__ Deinfluencing, according to environmental educator Isaias Hernandez, is a rapidly growing trend that purports to educate the general public on the need to divest away from obtaining or upholding an excess of products that are not needed in our daily lives. Instead of propping products up, deinfluencers tend to caution their followers against purchasing items—whether because it’s overpriced, potentially harmful, or ethically questionable.

     __(33)__ Not everyone is sold on it. Some see deinfluencing as a savvy marketing ploy in its own right, just another bandwagon for opportunists to jump on and figure out how they can capitalize on it. The odds are that some deinfluencers are getting paid by rival brands to disparage products. For example, they may discourage viewers from buying a lip gloss which costs $ 42 but recommend a $10 lip gloss instead. There are those, nonetheless, who maintain that deinfluencing can bring about positive change. Adherents of the trend argue that many deinfluencers still dedicate themselves to spreading a deeper message to their followers about the cost of waste associated with fashion or beauty industries and how to live sustainably in a way that helps the planet. __(34)__ It prompts businesses to work harder on product transparency and ethical marketing practices, if they would like to mitigate the impact of deinfluencing and develop lasting connections with consumers. 

       Although its long-term impacts on the environment and society remain to be seen, deinfluencing has evolved from a backlash to mass advertising to a more nuanced discussion around overconsumption. __(35)__ This fosters a culture of mindful consumption and minimalism. No matter what, perhaps the key for consumers is not swallowing everything you see on TikTok, YouTube or Instagram hook, line and sinker. That way, you don’t need to be deinfluenced. 

 (AB) The movement encourages individuals to exercise discernment before succumbing to the allure of influencerendorsed products. 

(AC) Furthermore, deinfluencing helps promote honest conversations about products. 

(AD) Is deinfluencing just the opposite of influencing? Yes, but with some caveats.

(AE) Is deinfluencing a bona fide antidote to the gluttonous consumerism of the internet age?

(BC) The 2024 Consumer Buying Habits Report also shows that over one-third of consumers have opted out of purchases due to negative online reviews or influencer criticism (deinfluencing).

(BD) This hints the need for brands to adjust their marketing strategies to resonate with the specific media consumption preferences of their target audience.

(BE) NPR once surveyed its readers about their relationship with social media and heard from dozens of people who relayed being fed up with constant advertising on social media, feeling buyer's remorse after following an influencer's recommendation.