105年 - 105 高等考試_三級_新聞（選試英文）、新聞（選試日文）：新聞英文#54476

      Germans have demonstrated that unlike their previous generations, they are compassionate to refugees and immigrants. Aware of their historical background, they decided to open their gate to over one millions refugees and illegal immigrants from Syria and other war-stricken countries. However, the welcoming refugee policy seems to have been challenged following the mass sexual attack on the New Year’s Eve in Cologne. Merkel’s refugee’s policy is confronted by more challenges. While more and more people believe that Merkel’s government has not controlled the refugee’s situation well, there is a rising right-wing political party called AFD, abbreviated from Alternative for Germany (Alternative für Deutschland) whose political stance is explicitly anti-immigration. The successful results for AFD in the federal states election in March 2016 show that many approve the restrictive policy on refugees.         Despite this, it was found in April from the latest poll on the government’s performance on refugee issue, that 94% German citizens were willing to offer refuge to refugees who are fleeing from war and that 76% of supporter of the AFD also agreed with this view. The refugee integration in many parts of Germany was seemingly successful. In some cities, local volunteers helped to organize refugee integration, donated clothing and offered German-language courses for new arrivals. Regarding the aspect of the economy, the social welfare costs play an important role. Pro-refugee supporters argue that the costs for the refugees often return to the labor force in the economy, and will eventually lead to economic growth. Hence, some economic experts mentioned that the present day cost of the refugees might be an investment for tomorrow.

     The parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreed at their annual conference in Paris in December 2015 on a policy for climate change. At the Paris climate conference (COP21) in December 2015, 195 countries adopted the first-ever universal, legally binding global climate deal. The agreement sets out a global action plan to put the world on track to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2°C. The agreement is due to enter into force in 2020. 

     The most important difference between the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris agreement is that, under the Paris agreement, developing countries are submitting pledges to reduce emissions. They had no emissions-reduction (mitigation) obligations under Kyoto. The root of the sharp dichotomy between developed and developing countries in the Kyoto Protocol, with respect to mitigation obligations, is a clause in the Convention itself: 

      The Parties should protect the climate system for the benefit of present and future generations of humankind, on the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Accordingly, the developed country Parties should take the lead in combating climate change and the adverse effects therefore.

 在馬來西亞涉嫌電信詐騙案的三十二名臺灣人被中國押走，行政院院長林全昨表示 中國的做法是在傷害臺灣的司法權，沒辦法妥善解決兩岸合作打擊犯罪的機制，新 政府會從此方向盡量和對岸溝通，希望雙方有善意互動，來解決這個問題。林全說， 問題關鍵在於兩岸如何合作打擊犯罪、如何解決目前詐欺案件的定罪、詐騙所得掌 控及返還給受害當事人等問題，相關細節仍要兩岸充分溝通、完善合作機制，盡量 和對岸溝通，讓兩岸打擊犯罪制度更周延、朝正面發展。