9 下列何種療法不適合做為較輕微的社區感染腹膜炎之初始治療?
(A) Cefoxitin
(B) Cefotetan
(C) Cefuroxime
(D) Piperacillin and Tazobactam
統計: A(109), B(112), C(741), D(953), E(0) #411200
詳解 (共 9 筆)
61.經腹膜透析液培養為Staphylococcus epidermidis infection,下列何者為最合適的治療藥品?
(A)steroids
(B)metronidazole
(C)vancomycin
(D)cefazolin
專技 - 藥物治療學- 107 年 - 107年第二次專技高考-藥師-藥物治療學#70392
筆記:The increasing prevalence of vancomycin-resistant organisms has resulted in a shift in empiric therapy away from vancomycin, toward first-generation cephalosporins (cefazolin or cephalothin).」
由於臨床發現越來越多腹膜感染的菌株,對於Vancomycin都產生抗藥性。因此經驗性療法排除Vancomycin,而改用第一代Cepha(如cefazolin)來做為首選藥物。
32.有關腹膜透析導致之bacterial peritonitis,下列敘述何者正確?
(A)診斷之依據為腹膜透析液中WBC>500 /mm3且neutrophils>50%
(B)經驗性抗生素首選為ceftazidime單一治療
(C)經驗性抗生素首選為vancomycin單一治療
(D)以intraperitoneal給藥比intravenous給藥更適當
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in adults: Treatment and prophylaxis
TREATMENT
In patients with suspected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), empiric therapy should be initiated as soon as possible to maximize the patient's chance of survival.
However, antibiotics should not be given until ascitic fluid has been obtained for culture.
Most cases of SBP are due to gut bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella, though streptococcal and staphylococcal infectionscan also occur. As a result, broad-spectrum therapy is warranted until the results of susceptibility testing are available. We prefer cefotaxime 2 g intravenously every eight hours because it has been shown to produce excellent ascitic fluid levels.
Indications for antibiotic therapy — Empiric therapy for SBP should be started in a patient with ascites who has one or more of the following findings :
●Temperature greater than 37.8°C (100°F)
●Abdominal pain and/or tenderness
●A change in mental status
●Ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count ≥250 cells/mm3
Choice of antibiotic — Most cases of SBP are due to gut bacteria such as E. coli and Klebsiella; however, streptococcal and, infrequently, staphylococcal infections can also occur. As a result, relatively broad-spectrum therapy is warranted in patients with suspected ascitic fluid infection. Clinical trials directly comparing different regimens are limited, and no antibiotic or combination of antibiotics has been proven to be superior to other regimens for the treatment of SBP. Our preference is to use intravenous cefotaxime 2 g every eight hours for most patients because it produces excellent blood and ascitic fluid levels throughout the dosing interval. Alternatives include other third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.
Third-generation cephalosporins — Several antibiotic regimens have been shown to be effective for the treatment of SBP, but trials directly comparing different antibiotic regimens are lacking. A third-generation cephalosporin is a reasonable choice for suspected SBP. Our preference is to give cefotaxime 2 g intravenously every eight hours. While ceftriaxone has been shown to prevent SBP in the setting of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis, in our experience, cefotaxime is more effective than ceftriaxone for treating SBP. If ceftriaxone is used, patients should be given 2 g per day.
Other antibiotics — Other antibiotics can be used for the treatment of SBP. Whenever possible, the alternative antibiotic should have been studied for the treatment of SBP. Ciprofloxacin can be used for patients who cannot take a cephalosporin, although it does not penetrate into ascitic fluid to the same extent as cefotaxime. We give ciprofloxacin at a dose of 400 mg intravenously twice daily to patients with normal renal function.
Antibiotic resistance — A concern related to the choice of antibiotics is the emergence of resistant infections, especially in centers that use fluoroquinolones for SBP prophylaxis. Cefotaxime is appropriate treatment in patients who have been receiving SBP prophylaxis with a fluoroquinolone.
In settings where resistance to third-generation cephalosporinshas been documented, piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenemhas been used empirically as an alternative to cefotaxime, although there is less clinical experience. Further study on the efficacy of alternative antibiotic regimens is needed.
Duration of therapy — Trials have found that short-courses of treatment for SBP are effective. Many patients will respond to a treatment course of five days.
We treat most patients for five days, including patients who are bacteremic (as they did in the 5- versus 10-day trial). Only patients who grow an unusual organism (eg, pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae), an organism resistant to standard antibiotic therapy, or an organism routinely associated with endocarditis (eg, Staphylococcus aureus or viridans group streptococci) are initially considered for longer treatment. After five days, we reassess the patient. Treatment is discontinued if there has been the usual dramatic improvement. However, if fever or pain persists, paracentesis is repeated, and the decision to continue or discontinue treatment is determined by the PMN response:
●If the PMN count is <250 cells/mm3, treatment is stopped.
●If the PMN count is greater than the pretreatment value, a search for a surgical source of infection is undertaken.
●If the PMN count is elevated but less than the pretreatment value, antibiotics are continued for another 48 hours, and paracentesis is repeated.
Secondary bacterial peritonitis and polymicrobial infections — Patients with suspected secondary bacterial peritonitis should receive broader coverage with cefotaxime and metronidazole. A similar regimen should be used with polymicrobial bacterascites.
這題考的是「腹腔內感染(Intra-abdominal infections,包含腹膜炎)」在臨床藥物治療學上最核心的鐵則:必須覆蓋「厭氧菌(Anaerobes)」,特別是脆弱類桿菌(Bacteroides fragilis)!
因為腹膜炎通常來自腸胃道的細菌外漏,而人類腸道裡除了大腸桿菌之外,絕大多數都是厭氧菌。如果抗生素單打獨鬥(單一療法),它本身就必須自帶強大的抗厭氧菌能力。
我們來拆解為什麼 (C) 是最不適合的選項,這也是國考針對「第二代頭孢菌素 (Cephalosporins)」最愛考的陷阱:
為什麼 (C) Cefuroxime 不適合?
Cefuroxime 是一般的第二代頭孢菌素。它對常見的革蘭氏陽性菌和部分陰性菌有效,但是,它「幾乎沒有抗腸道厭氧菌的能力」!
如果在臨床上真的想用 Cefuroxime 來治療腹腔感染,「必須」額外搭配 Metronidazole(專殺厭氧菌的藥物) 組合成雙重療法才行。如果像題目這樣作為單一初始治療,它會完全漏掉致命的厭氧菌,導致治療失敗,所以它最不適合。
順便複習:為什麼 (A) 跟 (B) 卻可以?
你可能會納悶,(A) Cefoxitin 和 (B) Cefotetan 不也常常被歸類在「第二代」嗎?為什麼它們就可以?
-
特殊的 Cephamycin 家族: 這兩個藥物雖然常被統稱為第二代,但它們的結構屬於特殊的 Cephamycin(頭黴素) 類。
-
自帶抗厭氧菌天賦: Cephamycin 家族最大的特色,就是它們天生對腸道厭氧菌有很好的殺傷力。因此,在治療指引(Guidelines)中,Cefoxitin 和 Cefotetan 一直都是輕中度腹腔感染「單一療法(Monotherapy)」的經典首選用藥。
那 (D) Piperacillin/Tazobactam 呢?
這是一支鼎鼎大名的超廣效「大砲」級抗生素(俗稱 Tazocin),它的抗菌譜超級廣,當然也包含了極強的厭氧菌覆蓋能力。雖然在現代抗生素管制的觀念裡,輕度感染用它可能有點「殺雞用牛刀」,但就藥理學的抗菌涵蓋範圍來說,它絕對能有效治癒腹膜炎,不會像 Cefuroxime 那樣產生治療破口。
? 考場秒殺總結:
看到**「腹腔感染 / 腹膜炎」** ➔ 找能殺**「厭氧菌」**的藥。
在廣義的第二代頭孢菌素中,只有 Cefoxitin、Cefotetan、Cefmetazole 這三個 Cephamycin 兄弟有抗厭氧菌能力,可以單獨用於腹腔感染。其他的一般二代(如 Cefuroxime)通通不行!
(B)厭氧菌對Cefotetan抗藥性太高