阿摩線上測驗 登入

最新科目

最新試卷

115年 - 115 調查特種考試_三等_營繕工程組:政府採購法#143390(4題)

115年 - 115 海岸巡防特種考試_五等_海洋巡護:航海學大意與輪機學大意#143389(40題)

115年 - 115 海岸巡防特種考試_四等_海洋巡護科輪機組:輪機工程概要(包括推進裝置概要、輔機概要與輪機英文)#143388(9題)

115年 - 115 海岸巡防特種考試_五等_海洋巡護:海巡勤務大意與海巡法規大意(包括海岸巡防法、國家安全法、海洋污染防治法、海關緝私條例、中華民國領海及鄰接區法、懲治走私條例、海岸巡防機關器械使用條例、臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例第二章行政與第五章罰則、中華民國專屬經濟海域及大陸礁層法)#143387(50題)

115年 - 115 司法、調查特種考試_三等_司法事務官法律事務組、法院書記官、檢察事務官偵查實務組、法律實務組:刑事訴訟法#143386(2題)

115年 - 115 調查特種考試_三等_財經實務組:經濟學#143385(8題)

115年 - 115 調查特種考試_三等_營繕工程組:結構分析(包括材料力學與結構學)#143384(4題)

115年 - 115 海岸巡防特種考試_三等_各科組別:海巡法規(包括海岸巡防法、國家安全法、海洋污染防治法、海關緝私條例、中華民國領海及鄰接區法、懲治走私條例、海岸巡防機關器械使用條例、臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例第二章行政與第五章罰則、中華民國專屬經濟海域及大陸礁層法)#143383(27題)

115年 - 115 司法特種考試_三等_檢察事務官營繕工程組:政府採購法#143382(4題)

115年 - 115 調查特種考試_三等_調查工作組(選試日文):外國文(日文)#143381(6題)

最新試題

最新申論題

II. Essay Writing (50%) In the last two years, the Covid-19 pandemic has willy-nilly forced us to enter a new era for distant learning wherein teachers and students alike have been faced with challenges and changes in schooling. While many may have embraced the new way of schooling they have encountered, relishing the freedom and flexibility offered by online learning, others may have suffered a lot from the losses of real contacts with teachers and peers in a classroom setting, which are essential parts of all face-to-face meetings. Write an essay in which you depict the effects of the Covid-19 outbreak in education, either focusing on the positive, or the negative outcomes of distant learning during or after the pandemic.

I. Critical Thinking and Writing (50%)Below is an excerpt selected from Peter Wingrove's (2022) work published in English for Specific Purposes. Discuss (1)what the rationale(s) and goal(s) of this paper and (2)summarize the article in less than 150 words.This research article contributes to the literature which characterises TED talks and academic lectures in terms of linguistic features, with the aim of informing pedagogy. The primary motivation for this research is the introduction of TED talks into educational settings, particularly within English for Academic Purposes (EAP), where TED talks are recommended for academic listening practice (De Chazal, 2014) and sometimes conflated with academic discourse within research (e.g. Abdulrahman, 2017; Elk, 2014; Takaesu, 2014). Moreover, TED talks feature prominently in contemporary textbooks marketed at university students, such as the Keynote (Dummet, Stephenson, Bohlke, & Lansford, 2016–2018), Perspectives (Barber, Dellar, Jeffries, & Lansford, 2018), and 21st Century Communication (Baker, Blass, Williams, Bonesteel, & Lee, 2017) series. The underlying presupposition is that TED talks are a form of academic discourse, or at least suitably similar to act as a substitute in EAP classes. This assumption is not unfounded as certain features of TED talks suggest at least overlap with academic discourses. For instance, TED hosts a range of speakers, including entrepreneurs, politicians, writers, artists, and notably, a number of academics (Cassidy et al., 2013). In terms of topic, the TED website uses a series of content tags to organise the talks, listing six main tags: technology, entertainment, design, business, science, and global issues; and over 400 minor tags, a set of which denote academic content such as chemistry, biology, math, history, and philosophy. Academic lexis is a crucial component of academic language, linked to successful academic listening and performance. Interview and survey data has found that many L2 students struggle to understand academic lectures in English (Mulligan & Kirkpatrick, 2000), with limited vocabulary knowledge reported to cause comprehension difficulties (Ali, 2020; Yeh, 2014). Moreover, prior studies have demonstrated a correlation between vocabulary knowledge and academic performance (Masrai & Milton, 2018; Roche & Harrington, 2013) and the use of academic vocabulary has been found to increase in student writing as they progress through academia, suggesting they are an important feature (Durrant, 2016). Therefore, academic vocabulary knowledge appears to be important for academic listening, academic writing, and academic performance overall. Comparing TED talks and academic lectures in terms of academic lexis gives an indication of how useful TED talks are for preparing students for the academic vocabulary demands of lectures. Prior research has made some progress in this direction. A previous study found that the Academic Vocabulary List (AVL; Gardner & Davies, 2014) covered 6.56% of TED talks on average, compared to 9.35% of academic lectures (Wingrove, 2017). However, this research was limited in terms of corpus size (49 talks), scope (only technology, design, and entertainment talks) and in the measure of academic content, which only considered written academic vocabulary. As the use of AVL items has been found to vary substantially across disciplines (Durrant, 2016), the limited number of topics in this study is a notable limitation. Moreover, academic lexis has been captured in a number of ways, using differing criteria and aims. Therefore, in order to inform the suitable use of TED Talks in ESP contexts, the current study analyses the coverage of three lists of academic lexis across two corpora, which were designed for this study: the TED Talk Corpus (TTC; n = 2,483, tokens = 5,068,781) and the Open Yale Courses Lecture Corpus (OYCLC; n = 2,483, tokens = 5,068,781). The TTC includes over 400 topic tags and the OYCLC covers a broad range of academic disciplines. Academic lexis is defined by the Academic Word List (AWL; Coxhead, 2000), the Academic Vocabulary List (AVL; Gardner & Davies, 2014), and the Academic Spoken Word List levels 2–4 (ASWL; Dang, Coxhead & Webb 2017). To investigate the extent and the ways in which TED talks are different from OYCLC lectures in terms of academic lexis, a corpus-based approach (see Tognini-Bonelli, 2001) is taken to answer the following research questions: (1) Do TED talks differ from OYCLC lectures in terms of academic lexis? (2) To what extent are these differences present across the different disciplinary categories? and (3) Which academic lexes are frequent in TED talks and how does this compare with frequent academic lexes in lectures?

題目八:【10分】請說明職業衛生護理人員之角色,至少3項.

最新課程

最新主題筆記

最新討論

41. What is the central theme of the passage? (A)Technological systems inevitably diminish human autonomy. (B)The influence of algorithms is limited to information retrieval processes. (C)Technological innovation primarily enhances efficiency and social interaction. (D)The expansion of digital technologies reshapes human agency and decision-making.

42. The term “filter bubbles” most nearly refers to: (A)Algorithmically curated environments that restrict exposure to diverse viewpoints (B)Technical limitations that prevent access to accurate information (C)Digital platforms designed to increase user engagement (D)Personalized systems that enhance the quality of information selection

43. What risk is associated with algorithmic mediation of decisions? (A)It increases users’ awareness of alternative perspectives. (B)It reduces the need for human judgment in routine tasks. (C)It may discourage critical evaluation of information and choices. (D)It improves the efficiency of information processing.

9 依司法院解釋意旨,下列何者違憲侵害憲法保障之工作權? (A)不動產估價師法禁止不動產估價師設立分事務所(B)藥事法限制醫師藥品調劑權(C)藥師法規定藥師執業處所應以一處為限(D)中醫師特考有零分或專業科目平均成績或特定科目成績未達規定者不予及格

10 依司法院解釋意旨及憲法法庭裁判,關於訴訟權保障之敘述,下列何者錯誤? (A)向法院提起訴訟,請求依正當法律程序公平審判,以獲及時有效救濟之機會,為訴訟權保障之核心內容(B)審級制度屬訴訟權保障之核心內容,故任何訴訟事件均得上訴於第三審(C)法官先後參與同一案件上下級審判之迴避,屬訴訟權保障之核心內容(D)法定法官原則為法治國家所依循之憲法原則,法院案件之分配不容恣意操控

38 下列何者並非訴願先行程序? (A)稅捐稽徵法上之復查 (B)藥事法上之異議 (C)貿易法上之聲明異議 (D)公務人員保障法上之復審